Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Crook Census Tracts
  • County : Crook Zip Codes
  • County : Deschutes Census Tracts
  • County : Deschutes Zip Codes
  • County : Jefferson Census Tracts
  • County : Jefferson Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Adults with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 41031960301

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 41031960301

12.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Census Tracts, 41031960301 has a value of 12.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.9%.
OR Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 825 Oregon census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 41031960301 has a value of 12.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 41031960301 has a value of 12.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (18.3%), the target has  been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(18.3%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 41031960302

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 41031960302

11.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Census Tracts, 41031960302 has a value of 11.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.9%.
OR Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 825 Oregon census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 41031960302 has a value of 11.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 41031960302 has a value of 11.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (18.3%), the target has  been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(18.3%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 41035970100

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 41035970100

14.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Census Tracts, 41035970100 has a value of 14.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.9%.
OR Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 825 Oregon census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 41035970100 has a value of 14.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 41035970100 has a value of 14.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.