Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

2020-2024 Regional Health Improvement Plan (RHIP) Measures

The following measures or indicators are tracked for the 2020-2024 Regional Health Improvement Plan (RHIP).

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

Address Poverty and Enhance Self-Sufficiency

Address Poverty and Enhance Self-Sufficiency

Address Poverty and Enhance Self-Sufficiency

Graduation Rates Among Youth Experiencing Economic Disadvantage

Value
Compared to:

Address Poverty and Enhance Self-Sufficiency

Graduation Rates Among Youth Experiencing Economic Disadvantage

Value
Compared to:

Graduation Rates Among Youth Experiencing Economic Disadvantage County: Crook

Current Value:

Graduation Rates Among Youth Experiencing Economic Disadvantage County: Crook

87.3%
Percent (%)
(2020-2021 School Year)
Compared to:
Compared to the OR Value (79.0%), Crook has a value of 87.3% which is higher and better.
OR Value
(79.0% in 2018-2019 School Year)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Crook (87.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (77.2%).
Prior Value
(77.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Crook value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (76.6%), the target has  been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(76.6%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Graduation Rates Among Youth Experiencing Economic Disadvantage County: Deschutes

Current Value:

Graduation Rates Among Youth Experiencing Economic Disadvantage County: Deschutes

78.3%
Percent (%)
(2020-2021 School Year)
Compared to:
Compared to the OR Value (79.0%), Deschutes has a value of 78.3% which is lower and worse.
OR Value
(79.0% in 2018-2019 School Year)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (78.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (81.2%).
Prior Value
(81.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Deschutes value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (77.3%), the target has  been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(77.3%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Graduation Rates Among Youth Experiencing Economic Disadvantage County: Jefferson

Current Value:

Graduation Rates Among Youth Experiencing Economic Disadvantage County: Jefferson

87.2%
Percent (%)
(2020-2021 School Year)
Compared to:
Compared to the OR Value (79.0%), Jefferson has a value of 87.2% which is higher and better.
OR Value
(79.0% in 2018-2019 School Year)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (87.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (87.2%).
Prior Value
(87.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Jefferson value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (83.4%), the target has  been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(83.4%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Address Poverty and Enhance Self-Sufficiency

Food Insecurity Rate

Value
Compared to:

Address Poverty and Enhance Self-Sufficiency

Food Insecurity Rate

Value
Compared to:

Food Insecurity Rate County: Crook

Current Value:

Food Insecurity Rate County: Crook

10.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Crook has a value of 10.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Crook has a value of 10.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OR Value (10.5%), Crook has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
OR Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Crook has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Crook (10.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (11.5%).
Prior Value
(11.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Crook value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (13.0%), the target has  been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(13.0%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Food Insecurity Rate County: Deschutes

Current Value:

Food Insecurity Rate County: Deschutes

8.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Deschutes has a value of 8.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Deschutes has a value of 8.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OR Value (10.5%), Deschutes has a value of 8.4% which is lower and better.
OR Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Deschutes has a value of 8.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (8.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.8%).
Prior Value
(9.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Deschutes value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (11.0%), the target has  been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(11.0%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Food Insecurity Rate County: Jefferson

Current Value:

Food Insecurity Rate County: Jefferson

12.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Jefferson has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Jefferson has a value of 12.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OR Value (10.5%), Jefferson has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
OR Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Jefferson has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (12.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.1%).
Prior Value
(12.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Jefferson value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (11.3%), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(11.3%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Address Poverty and Enhance Self-Sufficiency

Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE)

Value
Compared to:

Address Poverty and Enhance Self-Sufficiency

Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE)

Value
Compared to:

Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) County: Crook

Current Value:

Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) County: Crook

45.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Crook has a value of 45.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.9%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to the OR Value (32.0%), Crook has a value of 45.4% which is higher and worse.
OR Value
(32.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Crook (45.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (42.2%).
Prior Value
(42.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (27.0%), the target has not been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(27.0%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) County: Deschutes

Current Value:

Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) County: Deschutes

25.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Deschutes has a value of 25.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.9%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to the OR Value (32.0%), Deschutes has a value of 25.3% which is lower and better.
OR Value
(32.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (25.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (24.6%).
Prior Value
(24.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (24.0%), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(24.0%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) County: Jefferson

Current Value:

Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) County: Jefferson

28.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Jefferson has a value of 28.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.9%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to the OR Value (32.0%), Jefferson has a value of 28.8% which is lower and better.
OR Value
(32.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (28.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (37.6%).
Prior Value
(37.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (32.0%), the target has  been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(32.0%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: La Pine

Current Value:

Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: La Pine

52.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, La Pine has a value of 52.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.9%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to OR Census Places, La Pine has a value of 52.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.4%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 301 locales.
Compared to the Deschutes, OR County Value (25.3%), La Pine has a value of 52.5% which is higher and worse.
Deschutes, OR County Value
(25.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Deschutes County value.
Compared to the OR Value (32.0%), La Pine has a value of 52.5% which is higher and worse.
OR Value
(32.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, La Pine (52.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (35.9%).
Prior Value
(35.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (24.0%), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(24.0%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: Madras

Current Value:

Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: Madras

33.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Madras has a value of 33.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.9%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to OR Census Places, Madras has a value of 33.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.4%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 301 locales.
Compared to the Jefferson, OR County Value (28.8%), Madras has a value of 33.2% which is higher and worse.
Jefferson, OR County Value
(28.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Jefferson County value.
Compared to the OR Value (32.0%), Madras has a value of 33.2% which is higher and worse.
OR Value
(32.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Madras (33.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (41.6%).
Prior Value
(41.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (32.0%), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(32.0%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: Prineville

Current Value:

Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: Prineville

56.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Prineville has a value of 56.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.9%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to OR Census Places, Prineville has a value of 56.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.4%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 301 locales.
Compared to the Crook, OR County Value (45.4%), Prineville has a value of 56.2% which is higher and worse.
Crook, OR County Value
(45.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Crook County value.
Compared to the OR Value (32.0%), Prineville has a value of 56.2% which is higher and worse.
OR Value
(32.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Prineville (56.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (49.6%).
Prior Value
(49.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (27.0%), the target has not been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(27.0%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: Redmond

Current Value:

Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: Redmond

32.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Redmond has a value of 32.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.9%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to OR Census Places, Redmond has a value of 32.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.4%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 301 locales.
Compared to the Deschutes, OR County Value (25.3%), Redmond has a value of 32.6% which is higher and worse.
Deschutes, OR County Value
(25.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Deschutes County value.
Compared to the OR Value (32.0%), Redmond has a value of 32.6% which is higher and worse.
OR Value
(32.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Redmond (32.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (31.1%).
Prior Value
(31.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (24.0%), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(24.0%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: Warm Springs

Current Value:

Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: Warm Springs

16.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Warm Springs has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.9%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to OR Census Places, Warm Springs has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.4%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 301 locales.
Compared to the Jefferson, OR County Value (28.8%), Warm Springs has a value of 16.1% which is lower and better.
Jefferson, OR County Value
(28.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Jefferson County value.
Compared to the OR Value (32.0%), Warm Springs has a value of 16.1% which is lower and better.
OR Value
(32.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Warm Springs (16.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (33.9%).
Prior Value
(33.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (32.0%), the target has  been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(32.0%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Address Poverty and Enhance Self-Sufficiency

Combined Housing and Transportation Cost As A Percent Of Income

Value
Compared to:

Address Poverty and Enhance Self-Sufficiency

Combined Housing and Transportation Cost As A Percent Of Income

Value
Compared to:

Combined Housing and Transportation Cost As A Percent Of Income County: Crook

Current Value:

Combined Housing and Transportation Cost As A Percent Of Income County: Crook

67.0%
Percent (%)
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Crook (67.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (65.0%).
Prior Value
(65.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (64%), the target has not been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(64%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Combined Housing and Transportation Cost As A Percent Of Income County: Deschutes

Current Value:

Combined Housing and Transportation Cost As A Percent Of Income County: Deschutes

58.0%
Percent (%)
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (58.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (58.0%).
Prior Value
(58.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (55%), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(55%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Combined Housing and Transportation Cost As A Percent Of Income County: Jefferson

Current Value:

Combined Housing and Transportation Cost As A Percent Of Income County: Jefferson

58.0%
Percent (%)
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (58.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (53.0%).
Prior Value
(53.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (55%), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(55%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Behavioral Health: Increase Access and Coordination

Behavioral Health: Increase Access and Coordination

Behavioral Health: Increase Access and Coordination

Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas

Value
Compared to:

Behavioral Health: Increase Access and Coordination

Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas

Value
Compared to:

Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: La Pine

Current Value:

Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: La Pine

0.13
Per 1,000 people
(2018-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, La Pine (0.13) is less and worse than the previously measured value (0.24).
Prior Value
(0.24)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the La Pine value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the La Pine RHIP Target (0.62), the target has not been met.
La Pine RHIP Target
(0.62)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: Madras

Current Value:

Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: Madras

0.61
Per 1,000 people
(2018-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Madras (0.61) is less and worse than the previously measured value (0.68).
Prior Value
(0.68)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Madras value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Madras RHIP Target (0.62), the target has not been met.
Madras RHIP Target
(0.62)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: Prineville

Current Value:

Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: Prineville

0.46
Per 1,000 people
(2018-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Prineville (0.46) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.46).
Prior Value
(0.46)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Prineville value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Prineville RHIP Target (0.62), the target has not been met.
Prineville RHIP Target
(0.62)

Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: Redmond

Current Value:

Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: Redmond

0.65
Per 1,000 people
(2018-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Redmond (0.65) is less and worse than the previously measured value (0.66).
Prior Value
(0.66)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Redmond value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Redmond RHIP Target (0.62), the target has  been met.
Redmond RHIP Target
(0.62)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: Warm Springs

Current Value:

Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: Warm Springs

0.44
Per 1,000 people
(2018-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Warm Springs (0.44) is greater and better than the previously measured value (0.34).
Prior Value
(0.34)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warm Springs value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Warm Springs RHIP Target (0.62), the target has not been met.
Warm Springs RHIP Target
(0.62)

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

Adults with Current Asthma

Value
Compared to:

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

Adults with Current Asthma

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Current Asthma County: Crook

Current Value:

Adults with Current Asthma County: Crook

10.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Crook has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.1%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Crook has a value of 10.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Crook has a value of 10.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (7.4%), the target has not been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(7.4%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Adults with Current Asthma County: Deschutes

Current Value:

Adults with Current Asthma County: Deschutes

10.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Deschutes has a value of 10.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.1%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Deschutes has a value of 10.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Deschutes has a value of 10.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (8.2%), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(8.2%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Adults with Current Asthma County: Jefferson

Current Value:

Adults with Current Asthma County: Jefferson

11.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Jefferson has a value of 11.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.1%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Jefferson has a value of 11.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Jefferson has a value of 11.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (12.9%), the target has  been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(12.9%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: La Pine

Current Value:

Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: La Pine

11.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Census Places, La Pine has a value of 11.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.5%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 367 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, La Pine has a value of 11.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Deschutes, OR County Value (10.5%), La Pine has a value of 11.5% which is higher and worse.
Deschutes, OR County Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Deschutes County value.
Compared to the US Value (9.7%), La Pine has a value of 11.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (8.2%), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(8.2%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: Madras

Current Value:

Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: Madras

11.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Census Places, Madras has a value of 11.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.5%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 367 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Madras has a value of 11.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Jefferson, OR County Value (11.1%), Madras has a value of 11.2% which is higher and worse.
Jefferson, OR County Value
(11.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Jefferson County value.
Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Madras has a value of 11.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (12.9%), the target has  been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(12.9%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: Prineville

Current Value:

Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: Prineville

11.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Census Places, Prineville has a value of 11.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.5%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 367 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Prineville has a value of 11.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Crook, OR County Value (10.8%), Prineville has a value of 11.3% which is higher and worse.
Crook, OR County Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Crook County value.
Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Prineville has a value of 11.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (7.4%), the target has not been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(7.4%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: Redmond

Current Value:

Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: Redmond

11.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Census Places, Redmond has a value of 11.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.5%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 367 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Redmond has a value of 11.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Deschutes, OR County Value (10.5%), Redmond has a value of 11.3% which is higher and worse.
Deschutes, OR County Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Deschutes County value.
Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Redmond has a value of 11.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (8.2%), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(8.2%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: Warm Springs

Current Value:

Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: Warm Springs

15.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Census Places, Warm Springs has a value of 15.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.5%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 367 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Warm Springs has a value of 15.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Jefferson, OR County Value (11.1%), Warm Springs has a value of 15.2% which is higher and worse.
Jefferson, OR County Value
(11.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Jefferson County value.
Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Warm Springs has a value of 15.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (12.9%), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(12.9%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

Adults with Cancer: Age-adjusted

Value
Compared to:

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

Adults with Cancer: Age-adjusted

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Cancer: Age-adjusted County: Crook

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer: Age-adjusted County: Crook

7.8%
(2014-2017)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Crook has a value of 7.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.9%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 34 Oregon counties.
Compared to the OR Value (7.2%), Crook has a value of 7.8% which is higher and worse.
OR Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Crook (7.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.3%).
Prior Value
(7.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (7.0%), the target has not been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(7.0%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Adults with Cancer: Age-adjusted County: Deschutes

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer: Age-adjusted County: Deschutes

7.1%
(2014-2017)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Deschutes has a value of 7.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.9%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 34 Oregon counties.
Compared to the OR Value (7.2%), Deschutes has a value of 7.1% which is lower and better.
OR Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (7.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.8%).
Prior Value
(8.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (6.4%), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(6.4%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Adults with Cancer: Age-adjusted County: Jefferson

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer: Age-adjusted County: Jefferson

5.4%
(2014-2017)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Jefferson has a value of 5.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.9%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 34 Oregon counties.
Compared to the OR Value (7.2%), Jefferson has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
OR Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (5.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (11.6%).
Prior Value
(11.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (4.9%), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(4.9%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

Adults with Cardiovascular Disease

Value
Compared to:

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

Adults with Cardiovascular Disease

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Cardiovascular Disease County: Crook

Current Value:

Adults with Cardiovascular Disease County: Crook

9.7%
(2014-2017)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Crook has a value of 9.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 32 Oregon counties.
Compared to the OR Value (7.1%), Crook has a value of 9.7% which is higher and worse.
OR Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Crook (9.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.3%).
Prior Value
(6.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (8.7%), the target has not been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(8.7%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Adults with Cardiovascular Disease County: Deschutes

Current Value:

Adults with Cardiovascular Disease County: Deschutes

4.8%
(2014-2017)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Deschutes has a value of 4.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 32 Oregon counties.
Compared to the OR Value (7.1%), Deschutes has a value of 4.8% which is lower and better.
OR Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (4.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.9%).
Prior Value
(4.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (4.3%), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(4.3%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Adults with Cardiovascular Disease County: Jefferson

Current Value:

Adults with Cardiovascular Disease County: Jefferson

5.7%
(2014-2017)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Jefferson has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 32 Oregon counties.
Compared to the OR Value (7.1%), Jefferson has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
OR Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (5.1%), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(5.1%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

Adults with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

Adults with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: La Pine

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: La Pine

10.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Census Places, La Pine has a value of 10.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 367 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, La Pine has a value of 10.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), La Pine has a value of 10.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(5.3%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Madras

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Madras

9.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Census Places, Madras has a value of 9.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 367 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Madras has a value of 9.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), Madras has a value of 9.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (18.3%), the target has  been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(18.3%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Prineville

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Prineville

10.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Census Places, Prineville has a value of 10.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 367 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Prineville has a value of 10.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), Prineville has a value of 10.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (9.5%), the target has not been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(9.5%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Redmond

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Redmond

8.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Census Places, Redmond has a value of 8.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 367 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Redmond has a value of 8.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), Redmond has a value of 8.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(5.3%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Warm Springs

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Warm Springs

14.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Census Places, Warm Springs has a value of 14.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 367 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Warm Springs has a value of 14.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), Warm Springs has a value of 14.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (18.3%), the target has  been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(18.3%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

Adults Who Are Obese

Value
Compared to:

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

Adults Who Are Obese

Value
Compared to:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: La Pine

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: La Pine

29.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Census Places, La Pine has a value of 29.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 367 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, La Pine has a value of 29.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), La Pine has a value of 29.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (19.9%), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(19.9%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: Madras

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: Madras

35.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Census Places, Madras has a value of 35.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 367 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Madras has a value of 35.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Madras has a value of 35.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (39.2%), the target has  been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(39.2%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: Prineville

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: Prineville

32.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Census Places, Prineville has a value of 32.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 367 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Prineville has a value of 32.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Prineville has a value of 32.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (29.3%), the target has not been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(29.3%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: Redmond

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: Redmond

27.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Census Places, Redmond has a value of 27.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 367 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Redmond has a value of 27.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Redmond has a value of 27.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (19.9%), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(19.9%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: Warm Springs

Current Value:

Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: Warm Springs

43.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Census Places, Warm Springs has a value of 43.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 367 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Warm Springs has a value of 43.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Warm Springs has a value of 43.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (39.2%), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(39.2%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 8th Grade

Value
Compared to:

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 8th Grade

Value
Compared to:

Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 8th Grade County: Crook

Current Value:

Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 8th Grade County: Crook

17.9%
Percent (%)
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the OR Value (22.4%), Crook has a value of 17.9% which is lower and worse.
OR Value
(22.4% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Crook (17.9%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (28.1%).
Prior Value
(28.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Crook value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (38%), the target has not been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(38%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 8th Grade County: Deschutes

Current Value:

Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 8th Grade County: Deschutes

15.5%
Percent (%)
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OR Value (22.4%), Deschutes has a value of 15.5% which is lower and worse.
OR Value
(22.4% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (15.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (17.1%).
Prior Value
(17.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Deschutes value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (33%), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(33%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 8th Grade County: Jefferson

Current Value:

Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 8th Grade County: Jefferson

19.5%
Percent (%)
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the OR Value (22.4%), Jefferson has a value of 19.5% which is lower and worse.
OR Value
(22.4% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (19.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (30.4%).
Prior Value
(30.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Jefferson value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (41%), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(41%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 11th Grade

Value
Compared to:

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 11th Grade

Value
Compared to:

Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 11th Grade County: Crook

Current Value:

Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 11th Grade County: Crook

9.0%
Percent (%)
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the OR Value (16.4%), Crook has a value of 9.0% which is lower and worse.
OR Value
(16.4% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Crook (9.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (21.3%).
Prior Value
(21.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Crook value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (31.0%), the target has not been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(31.0%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 11th Grade County: Deschutes

Current Value:

Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 11th Grade County: Deschutes

8.7%
Percent (%)
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OR Value (16.4%), Deschutes has a value of 8.7% which is lower and worse.
OR Value
(16.4% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (8.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (11.5%).
Prior Value
(11.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Deschutes value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (26.0%), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(26.0%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 11th Grade County: Jefferson

Current Value:

Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 11th Grade County: Jefferson

14.6%
Percent (%)
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the OR Value (16.4%), Jefferson has a value of 14.6% which is lower and worse.
OR Value
(16.4% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (14.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.6%).
Prior Value
(14.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Jefferson value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (25.0%), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(25.0%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

8th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days

Value
Compared to:

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

8th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days

Value
Compared to:

8th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Crook

Current Value:

8th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Crook

91.6%
Percentage
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Crook has a value of 91.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 27.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 25.1%.
OR Counties
(2019)
The distribution is based on data from 28 Oregon counties.
Compared to the OR Value (88.3%), Crook has a value of 91.6% which is higher and better.
OR Value
(88.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Crook (91.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (37.2%).
Prior Value
(37.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Crook value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (47%), the target has  been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(47%)

8th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Deschutes

Current Value:

8th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Deschutes

30.5%
Percentage
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Deschutes has a value of 30.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 27.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 25.1%.
OR Counties
(2019)
The distribution is based on data from 28 Oregon counties.
Compared to the OR Value (24.0%), Deschutes has a value of 30.5% which is higher and better.
OR Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (30.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (93.4%).
Prior Value
(93.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Deschutes value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (38%), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(38%)

8th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Jefferson

Current Value:

8th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Jefferson

86.8%
Percentage
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Jefferson has a value of 86.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 27.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 25.1%.
OR Counties
(2019)
The distribution is based on data from 28 Oregon counties.
Compared to the OR Value (88.3%), Jefferson has a value of 86.8% which is lower and worse.
OR Value
(88.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (86.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (21.5%).
Prior Value
(21.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Jefferson value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (32%), the target has  been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(32%)

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

11th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days

Value
Compared to:

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

11th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days

Value
Compared to:

11th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Crook

Current Value:

11th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Crook

88.1%
Percentage
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Crook has a value of 88.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.4%.
OR Counties
(2019)
The distribution is based on data from 28 Oregon counties.
Compared to the OR Value (80.9%), Crook has a value of 88.1% which is higher and better.
OR Value
(80.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Crook (88.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (29.1%).
Prior Value
(29.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Crook value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (39%), the target has  been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(39%)

11th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Deschutes

Current Value:

11th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Deschutes

19.7%
Percentage
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Deschutes has a value of 19.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.4%.
OR Counties
(2019)
The distribution is based on data from 28 Oregon counties.
Compared to the OR Value (18.0%), Deschutes has a value of 19.7% which is higher and better.
OR Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (19.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (83.5%).
Prior Value
(83.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Deschutes value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (26%), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(26%)

11th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Jefferson

Current Value:

11th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Jefferson

83.3%
Percentage
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Jefferson has a value of 83.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.4%.
OR Counties
(2019)
The distribution is based on data from 28 Oregon counties.
Compared to the OR Value (80.9%), Jefferson has a value of 83.3% which is higher and better.
OR Value
(80.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (83.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (19.8%).
Prior Value
(19.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Jefferson value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (30%), the target has  been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(30%)

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

Adults who Smoke

Value
Compared to:

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

Adults who Smoke

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Smoke County: Crook

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke County: Crook

15.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Crook has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Crook has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Crook has a value of 15.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (24.5%), the target has  been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(24.5%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Adults who Smoke County: Deschutes

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke County: Deschutes

12.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Deschutes has a value of 12.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Deschutes has a value of 12.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Deschutes has a value of 12.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (16.1%), the target has  been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(16.1%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Adults who Smoke County: Jefferson

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke County: Jefferson

16.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Jefferson has a value of 16.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Jefferson has a value of 16.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Jefferson has a value of 16.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (11.9%), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(11.9%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: La Pine

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: La Pine

17.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Census Places, La Pine has a value of 17.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.7%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 367 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, La Pine has a value of 17.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Deschutes, OR County Value (12.4%), La Pine has a value of 17.7% which is higher and worse.
Deschutes, OR County Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Deschutes County value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), La Pine has a value of 17.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (24.5%), the target has  been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(24.5%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (11.9%), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(11.9%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (16.1%), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(16.1%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Madras

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Madras

15.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Census Places, Madras has a value of 15.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.7%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 367 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Madras has a value of 15.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Jefferson, OR County Value (16.7%), Madras has a value of 15.8% which is lower and better.
Jefferson, OR County Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Jefferson County value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Madras has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (24.5%), the target has  been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(24.5%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (11.9%), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(11.9%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (16.1%), the target has  been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(16.1%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Prineville

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Prineville

16.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Census Places, Prineville has a value of 16.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.7%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 367 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Prineville has a value of 16.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Crook, OR County Value (15.2%), Prineville has a value of 16.3% which is higher and worse.
Crook, OR County Value
(15.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Crook County value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Prineville has a value of 16.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (16.1%), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(16.1%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (24.5%), the target has  been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(24.5%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (11.9%), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(11.9%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Redmond

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Redmond

15.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Census Places, Redmond has a value of 15.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.7%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 367 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Redmond has a value of 15.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Deschutes, OR County Value (12.4%), Redmond has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
Deschutes, OR County Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Deschutes County value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Redmond has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (16.1%), the target has  been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(16.1%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (24.5%), the target has  been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(24.5%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (11.9%), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(11.9%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Warm Springs

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke Census Place: Warm Springs

31.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Census Places, Warm Springs has a value of 31.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.7%.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 367 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Warm Springs has a value of 31.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Jefferson, OR County Value (16.7%), Warm Springs has a value of 31.1% which is higher and worse.
Jefferson, OR County Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Jefferson County value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Warm Springs has a value of 31.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (24.5%), the target has not been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(24.5%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (11.9%), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(11.9%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (16.1%), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(16.1%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

Rate of persons hospitalized for stroke per 100,000: Age-adjusted

Value
Compared to:

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

Rate of persons hospitalized for stroke per 100,000: Age-adjusted

Value
Compared to:

Rate of persons hospitalized for stroke per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Crook

Current Value:

Rate of persons hospitalized for stroke per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Crook

216.0
Rate per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Crook (216.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (234.1).
Prior Value
(234.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (196.0), the target has not been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(196.0)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Rate of persons hospitalized for stroke per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Deschutes

Current Value:

Rate of persons hospitalized for stroke per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Deschutes

183.6
Rate per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (183.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (200.0).
Prior Value
(200.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (190.0), the target has  been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(190.0)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Rate of persons hospitalized for stroke per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Jefferson

Current Value:

Rate of persons hospitalized for stroke per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Jefferson

286.8
Rate per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (286.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (338.0).
Prior Value
(338.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (319.0), the target has  been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(319.0)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

Rate of persons hospitalized for diabetes per 100,000: Age-adjusted

Value
Compared to:

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

Rate of persons hospitalized for diabetes per 100,000: Age-adjusted

Value
Compared to:

Rate of persons hospitalized for diabetes per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Crook

Current Value:

Rate of persons hospitalized for diabetes per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Crook

95.1
Rate per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Crook (95.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (122.6).
Prior Value
(122.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (86.0), the target has not been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(86.0)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Rate of persons hospitalized for diabetes per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Deschutes

Current Value:

Rate of persons hospitalized for diabetes per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Deschutes

64.7
Rate per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (64.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (80.9).
Prior Value
(80.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (59.5), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(59.5)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Rate of persons hospitalized for diabetes per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Jefferson

Current Value:

Rate of persons hospitalized for diabetes per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Jefferson

132.5
Rate per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (132.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (160.3).
Prior Value
(160.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (128.8), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(128.8)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

5-Year Gonorrhea Rate per 100,000: Age-Adjusted

Value
Compared to:

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

5-Year Gonorrhea Rate per 100,000: Age-Adjusted

Value
Compared to:

5-Year Gonorrhea Rate per 100,000: Age-Adjusted County: Crook

Current Value:

5-Year Gonorrhea Rate per 100,000: Age-Adjusted County: Crook

81.8
Per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the OR Value (141.1), Crook has a value of 81.8 which is lower and better.
OR Value
(141.1)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Crook (81.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (79.5).
Prior Value
(79.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Crook value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (52.7), the target has not been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(52.7)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

5-Year Gonorrhea Rate per 100,000: Age-Adjusted County: Deschutes

Current Value:

5-Year Gonorrhea Rate per 100,000: Age-Adjusted County: Deschutes

42.2
Per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the OR Value (141.1), Deschutes has a value of 42.2 which is lower and better.
OR Value
(141.1)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (42.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (38.0).
Prior Value
(38.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Deschutes value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (23.5), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(23.5)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

5-Year Gonorrhea Rate per 100,000: Age-Adjusted County: Jefferson

Current Value:

5-Year Gonorrhea Rate per 100,000: Age-Adjusted County: Jefferson

178.5
Per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the OR Value (141.1), Jefferson has a value of 178.5 which is higher and worse.
OR Value
(141.1)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (178.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (161.1).
Prior Value
(161.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Jefferson value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (95.8), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(95.8)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

5-Year Syphilis Case Count

Value
Compared to:

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

5-Year Syphilis Case Count

Value
Compared to:

5-Year Syphilis Case Count Region: Central Oregon

Current Value:

5-Year Syphilis Case Count Region: Central Oregon

72
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Central Oregon (72) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (66).
Prior Value
(66)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Central Oregon value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Central Oregon RHIP Target (37), the target has not been met.
Central Oregon RHIP Target
(37)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

Individuals Receiving Both an Annual Wellness Visit and Preventative Dental Visit

Value
Compared to:

Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities

Individuals Receiving Both an Annual Wellness Visit and Preventative Dental Visit

Value
Compared to:

Individuals Receiving Both an Annual Wellness Visit and Preventative Dental Visit County: Crook

Current Value:

Individuals Receiving Both an Annual Wellness Visit and Preventative Dental Visit County: Crook

6.6
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Crook (6.6) is less and worse than the previously measured value (8.0).
Prior Value
(8.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Crook value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (19.10), the target has not been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(19.10)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2024 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Individuals Receiving Both an Annual Wellness Visit and Preventative Dental Visit County: Deschutes

Current Value:

Individuals Receiving Both an Annual Wellness Visit and Preventative Dental Visit County: Deschutes

9.9
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (9.9) is greater and better than the previously measured value (9.8).
Prior Value
(9.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Deschutes value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (23.10), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(23.10)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2024 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Individuals Receiving Both an Annual Wellness Visit and Preventative Dental Visit County: Jefferson

Current Value:

Individuals Receiving Both an Annual Wellness Visit and Preventative Dental Visit County: Jefferson

10.6
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (10.6) is greater and better than the previously measured value (9.7).
Prior Value
(9.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Jefferson value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (21.30), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(21.30)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2024 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Stable Housing and Supports

Stable Housing and Supports

Stable Housing and Supports

Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households

Value
Compared to:

Stable Housing and Supports

Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households

Value
Compared to:

Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households Region: Central Oregon

Current Value:

Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households Region: Central Oregon

18.92%
Percent (%)
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Central Oregon (18.92%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.32%).
Prior Value
(11.32%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Central Oregon value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Central Oregon RHIP Target (13%), the target has not been met.
Central Oregon RHIP Target
(13%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households County: Crook

Current Value:

Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households County: Crook

15.36%
Percent (%)
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Central Oregon Region Value (18.92%), Crook has a value of 15.36% which is lower and better.
Central Oregon Region Value
(18.92%)
The regional value is compared to the Central Oregon Region value.
Compared to the prior value, Crook (15.36%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.75%).
Prior Value
(10.75%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Crook value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Central Oregon RHIP Target (13%), the target has not been met.
Central Oregon RHIP Target
(13%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households County: Deschutes

Current Value:

Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households County: Deschutes

19.92%
Percent (%)
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Central Oregon Region Value (18.92%), Deschutes has a value of 19.92% which is higher and worse.
Central Oregon Region Value
(18.92%)
The regional value is compared to the Central Oregon Region value.
Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (19.92%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.08%).
Prior Value
(13.08%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Deschutes value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Central Oregon RHIP Target (13%), the target has not been met.
Central Oregon RHIP Target
(13%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households County: Jefferson

Current Value:

Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households County: Jefferson

14.47%
Percent (%)
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Central Oregon Region Value (18.92%), Jefferson has a value of 14.47% which is lower and better.
Central Oregon Region Value
(18.92%)
The regional value is compared to the Central Oregon Region value.
Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (14.47%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.64%).
Prior Value
(8.64%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Jefferson value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Central Oregon RHIP Target (13%), the target has not been met.
Central Oregon RHIP Target
(13%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Holders Able to Find and Lease a Housing Unit Region: Central Oregon

Current Value:

Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Holders Able to Find and Lease a Housing Unit Region: Central Oregon

18.0%
Percent (%)
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Central Oregon (18.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (30.2%).
Prior Value
(30.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Central Oregon value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Central Oregon RHIP Target (50%), the target has not been met.
Central Oregon RHIP Target
(50%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Substance and Alcohol Misuse: Prevention and Treatment

Substance and Alcohol Misuse: Prevention and Treatment

Substance and Alcohol Misuse: Prevention and Treatment

Adults Who Reported Binge Drinking:18 to 34

Value
Compared to:

Substance and Alcohol Misuse: Prevention and Treatment

Adults Who Reported Binge Drinking:18 to 34

Value
Compared to:

Adults Who Reported Binge Drinking:18 to 34 Region: Central Oregon

Current Value:

Adults Who Reported Binge Drinking:18 to 34 Region: Central Oregon

32.0%
Percent (%)
(2014-2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Central Oregon (32.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (37.4%).
Prior Value
(37.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Central Oregon RHIP Target (25%), the target has not been met.
Central Oregon RHIP Target
(25%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Substance and Alcohol Misuse: Prevention and Treatment

11th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes

Value
Compared to:

Substance and Alcohol Misuse: Prevention and Treatment

11th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes

Value
Compared to:

11th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes County: Crook

Current Value:

11th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes County: Crook

27.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Crook has a value of 27.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
OR Counties
(2019)
The distribution is based on data from 28 Oregon counties.
Compared to the OR Value (11.9%), Crook has a value of 27.9% which is higher and worse.
OR Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Crook (27.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21.2%).
Prior Value
(21.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (20.2%), the target has not been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(20.2%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

11th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes County: Deschutes

Current Value:

11th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes County: Deschutes

14.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Deschutes has a value of 14.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
OR Counties
(2019)
The distribution is based on data from 28 Oregon counties.
Compared to the OR Value (10.8%), Deschutes has a value of 14.5% which is higher and worse.
OR Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (14.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (22.4%).
Prior Value
(22.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Deschutes value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (26.5%), the target has  been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(26.5%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

11th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes County: Jefferson

Current Value:

11th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes County: Jefferson

12.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Jefferson has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
OR Counties
(2019)
The distribution is based on data from 28 Oregon counties.
Compared to the OR Value (11.9%), Jefferson has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
OR Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (12.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.4%).
Prior Value
(14.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (14.9%), the target has  been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(14.9%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Substance and Alcohol Misuse: Prevention and Treatment

Services for Newly Diagnosed Individuals With Alcohol or Drug Dependence

Value
Compared to:

Substance and Alcohol Misuse: Prevention and Treatment

Services for Newly Diagnosed Individuals With Alcohol or Drug Dependence

Value
Compared to:

Services for Newly Diagnosed Individuals With Alcohol or Drug Dependence Region: Central Oregon

Current Value:

Services for Newly Diagnosed Individuals With Alcohol or Drug Dependence Region: Central Oregon

15.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Central Oregon (15.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (17.6%).
Prior Value
(17.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Central Oregon RHIP Target (30%), the target has not been met.
Central Oregon RHIP Target
(30%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Substance and Alcohol Misuse: Prevention and Treatment

Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates

Value
Compared to:

Substance and Alcohol Misuse: Prevention and Treatment

Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates

Value
Compared to:

Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: La Pine

Current Value:

Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: La Pine

13.9
Per 1,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, La Pine (13.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.9).
Prior Value
(13.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the La Pine value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: Madras

Current Value:

Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: Madras

21.3
Per 1,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Madras (21.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (19.8).
Prior Value
(19.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Madras value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Madras RHIP Target (13.8), the target has not been met.
Madras RHIP Target
(13.8)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: Prineville

Current Value:

Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: Prineville

21.5
Per 1,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Prineville (21.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (22.8).
Prior Value
(22.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Prineville value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Prineville RHIP Target (15.0), the target has not been met.
Prineville RHIP Target
(15.0)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: Redmond

Current Value:

Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: Redmond

16.0
Per 1,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Redmond (16.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (16.1).
Prior Value
(16.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Redmond value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: Warm Springs

Current Value:

Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: Warm Springs

52.0
Per 1,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Warm Springs (52.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (53.4).
Prior Value
(53.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warm Springs value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Warm Springs RHIP Target (35.3), the target has not been met.
Warm Springs RHIP Target
(35.3)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being

Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being

Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being

Kindergarten Readiness: Total Population

Value
Compared to:

Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being

Kindergarten Readiness: Total Population

Value
Compared to:

Kindergarten Readiness: Total Population County: Crook

Current Value:

Kindergarten Readiness: Total Population County: Crook

13
Scale (0-26)
(2019-2020 School Year)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Crook (13) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13).
Prior Value
(13)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Crook value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (15.8), the target has not been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(15.8)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a>.</p> </div>

Kindergarten Readiness: Total Population County: Deschutes

Current Value:

Kindergarten Readiness: Total Population County: Deschutes

15
Scale (0-26)
(2019-2020 School Year)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (15) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15).
Prior Value
(15)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Deschutes value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (17.5), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(17.5)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Kindergarten Readiness: Total Population County: Jefferson

Current Value:

Kindergarten Readiness: Total Population County: Jefferson

7
Scale (0-26)
(2019-2020 School Year)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (7) is less and worse than the previously measured value (8).
Prior Value
(8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Jefferson value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (13.5), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(13.5)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being

Kindergarten Readiness: Economically Disadvantaged

Value
Compared to:

Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being

Kindergarten Readiness: Economically Disadvantaged

Value
Compared to:

Kindergarten Readiness: Economically Disadvantaged County: Crook

Current Value:

Kindergarten Readiness: Economically Disadvantaged County: Crook

12
Scale (0-26)
(2018-2019 School Year)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Crook (12) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12).
Prior Value
(12)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (14.3), the target has not been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(14.3)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Kindergarten Readiness: Economically Disadvantaged County: Deschutes

Current Value:

Kindergarten Readiness: Economically Disadvantaged County: Deschutes

12
Scale (0-26)
(2018-2019 School Year)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (12) is greater and better than the previously measured value (11).
Prior Value
(11)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (14.6), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(14.6)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Kindergarten Readiness: Economically Disadvantaged County: Jefferson

Current Value:

Kindergarten Readiness: Economically Disadvantaged County: Jefferson

9
Scale (0-26)
(2018-2019 School Year)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9).
Prior Value
(9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (11.3), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(11.3)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being

Kindergarten Readiness: Underserved Races

Value
Compared to:

Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being

Kindergarten Readiness: Underserved Races

Value
Compared to:

Kindergarten Readiness: Underserved Races County: Crook

Current Value:

Kindergarten Readiness: Underserved Races County: Crook

10
Scale (0-26)
(2019-2020 School Year)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Crook (10) is less and worse than the previously measured value (11).
Prior Value
(11)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Crook value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (12.8), the target has not been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(12.8)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Kindergarten Readiness: Underserved Races County: Deschutes

Current Value:

Kindergarten Readiness: Underserved Races County: Deschutes

10
Scale (0-26)
(2019-2020 School Year)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (10) is less and worse than the previously measured value (14).
Prior Value
(14)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Deschutes value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (16.6), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(16.6)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Kindergarten Readiness: Underserved Races County: Jefferson

Current Value:

Kindergarten Readiness: Underserved Races County: Jefferson

6
Scale (0-26)
(2019-2020 School Year)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (6) is less and worse than the previously measured value (9).
Prior Value
(9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Jefferson value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (11.1), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(11.1)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being

3rd Grade Students Proficient in Reading

Value
Compared to:

Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being

3rd Grade Students Proficient in Reading

Value
Compared to:

3rd Grade Students Proficient in Reading County: Crook

Current Value:

3rd Grade Students Proficient in Reading County: Crook

47.9%
(2018-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Crook has a value of 47.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.7%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to the OR Value (46.5%), Crook has a value of 47.9% which is higher and better.
OR Value
(46.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Crook (47.9%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (50.7%).
Prior Value
(50.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (54.5%), the target has not been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(54.5%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

3rd Grade Students Proficient in Reading County: Deschutes

Current Value:

3rd Grade Students Proficient in Reading County: Deschutes

60.1%
(2018-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Deschutes has a value of 60.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.7%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to the OR Value (46.5%), Deschutes has a value of 60.1% which is higher and better.
OR Value
(46.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (60.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (60.5%).
Prior Value
(60.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (67.5%), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(67.5%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

3rd Grade Students Proficient in Reading County: Jefferson

Current Value:

3rd Grade Students Proficient in Reading County: Jefferson

43.0%
(2018-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Jefferson has a value of 43.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.7%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to the OR Value (46.5%), Jefferson has a value of 43.0% which is lower and worse.
OR Value
(46.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (43.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (39.9%).
Prior Value
(39.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (47.5%), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(47.5%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being

English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Economically Disadvantaged

Value
Compared to:

Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being

English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Economically Disadvantaged

Value
Compared to:

English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Economically Disadvantaged County: Crook

Current Value:

English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Economically Disadvantaged County: Crook

44.1%
Percent (%)
(2018-2019 School Year)
Compared to:
Compared to the OR Value (33.6%), Crook has a value of 44.1% which is higher and better.
OR Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Crook (44.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (44.4%).
Prior Value
(44.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Crook value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (51.0%), the target has not been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(51.0%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Economically Disadvantaged County: Deschutes

Current Value:

English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Economically Disadvantaged County: Deschutes

45.3%
Percent (%)
(2018-2019 School Year)
Compared to:
Compared to the OR Value (33.6%), Deschutes has a value of 45.3% which is higher and better.
OR Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (45.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (46.3%).
Prior Value
(46.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Deschutes value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (52.0%), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(52.0%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Economically Disadvantaged County: Jefferson

Current Value:

English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Economically Disadvantaged County: Jefferson

42.8%
Percent (%)
(2018-2019 School Year)
Compared to:
Compared to the OR Value (33.6%), Jefferson has a value of 42.8% which is higher and better.
OR Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (42.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (40.7%).
Prior Value
(40.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Jefferson value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (49.5%), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(49.5%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being

English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Underserved Races

Value
Compared to:

Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being

English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Underserved Races

Value
Compared to:

English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Underserved Races County: Crook

Current Value:

English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Underserved Races County: Crook

28.6%
Percent (%)
(2018-2019 School Year)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Crook (28.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (40.9%).
Prior Value
(40.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Crook value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (33.5%), the target has not been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(33.5%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Underserved Races County: Deschutes

Current Value:

English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Underserved Races County: Deschutes

40.6%
Percent (%)
(2018-2019 School Year)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (40.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (39.1%).
Prior Value
(39.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Deschutes value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (47%), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(47%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Underserved Races County: Jefferson

Current Value:

English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Underserved Races County: Jefferson

35.4%
Percent (%)
(2018-2019 School Year)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (35.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (31.3%).
Prior Value
(31.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Jefferson value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (40.5%), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(40.5%)
<div> <p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p> </div>

Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being

Proportion of Pregnancies That are Planned

Value
Compared to:

Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being

Proportion of Pregnancies That are Planned

Value
Compared to:

Proportion of Pregnancies That are Planned Region: Central Oregon

Current Value:

Proportion of Pregnancies That are Planned Region: Central Oregon

54.3%
Percent (%)
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Central Oregon (54.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (56.8%).
Prior Value
(56.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Central Oregon RHIP Target (56%), the target has not been met.
Central Oregon RHIP Target
(56%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being

Children Up-to-Date on Immunizations: 2 Years

Value
Compared to:

Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being

Children Up-to-Date on Immunizations: 2 Years

Value
Compared to:

Children Up-to-Date on Immunizations: 2 Years County: Crook

Current Value:

Children Up-to-Date on Immunizations: 2 Years County: Crook

70.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OR Value (69.0%), Crook has a value of 70.0% which is higher and better.
OR Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Crook (70.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (65.0%).
Prior Value
(65.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Crook value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (80%), the target has not been met.
Crook RHIP Target
(80%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Children Up-to-Date on Immunizations: 2 Years County: Deschutes

Current Value:

Children Up-to-Date on Immunizations: 2 Years County: Deschutes

69.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OR Value (69.0%), Deschutes has a value of 69.0%.
OR Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (69.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (71.0%).
Prior Value
(71.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Deschutes value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (80%), the target has not been met.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(80%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>

Children Up-to-Date on Immunizations: 2 Years County: Jefferson

Current Value:

Children Up-to-Date on Immunizations: 2 Years County: Jefferson

66.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OR Value (69.0%), Jefferson has a value of 66.0% which is lower and worse.
OR Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (66.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (71.0%).
Prior Value
(71.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Jefferson value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (80%), the target has not been met.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(80%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>